Good Journalism about Guns

Following up the last post on guns, here is an article from the New Yorker, How Did Guns Get So Powerful. It blew me away with its clarity and research. Herb Van Fleet’s research in the previous post was outstanding for legal perspective. This New Yorker article, as the title says, explains how guns became an integral part of American culture and ties in the technology. Wish I could write so well.


As the horror in Uvalde unfolded, there were plenty of armed police officers, but there was little willingness to charge in against a barricaded shooter. The police have been called cowards for their hesitancy, but their reaction is unsurprising: despite the often militaristic rhetoric of police unions, the average cop is not going to be ready for a situation most United States marines have never faced. When we arm our citizens with such lethal weapons, we can’t always expect uncommon valor.

About Jim Wheeler

U. S. Naval Academy, BS, Engineering, 1959; Naval line officer and submariner, 1959 -1981, Commander, USN; The George Washington U., MSA, Management Eng.; Aerospace Engineer, 1981-1999; Resident Gadfly, 1999 - present. Political affiliation: Democratic.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Good Journalism about Guns

  1. Don’t know if you follow Bill Maher or not, but last week he did a “new rules” segment on guns. He pointed out that Hollywood glorifies guns and that the violent movies are about revenge. He makes a good point. Here’s the whole thing if you’re interested.


  2. SusanR says:

    A huge amount of research went into that article, obviously. Very interesting and yet terribly discouraging.

    And for the record, I DO expect uncommon valor from our police officers when it is necessary. That’s what we pay them for, to take the risks that an average citizen won’t or can’t take. If they aren’t willing to do that, they shouldn’t be police officers.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Jim Wheeler says:

    Discovered: a significant exception to the case for culture being more significant than quantity of guns for mass shootings:


  4. Daniel Digby says:

    I suspect you know by now that I’ve given up on any rational solutions to gun violence. The best I can hope for is legislating responsibility for it and enforcing those laws. Good luck. No amount of remediation will undo what we have to put up with in the South… and West… hell, the whole US.


    • Jim Wheeler says:

      I have had the same thought, that the gun culture is too embedded to change. And then I recall being surprised by the acceptance of same-sex marriage and an assault-weapons ban. Culture can change, depends on which way the lemmings run, I guess.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.